%PDF- %PDF-
Direktori : /var/www/html/node_modules/eslint-plugin-import/docs/rules/ |
Current File : //var/www/html/node_modules/eslint-plugin-import/docs/rules/unambiguous.md |
# import/unambiguous Warn if a `module` could be mistakenly parsed as a `script` by a consumer leveraging [Unambiguous JavaScript Grammar] to determine correct parsing goal. Will respect the [`parserOptions.sourceType`] from ESLint config, i.e. files parsed as `script` per that setting will not be reported. This plugin uses [Unambiguous JavaScript Grammar] internally to decide whether dependencies should be parsed as modules and searched for exports matching the `import`ed names, so it may be beneficial to keep this rule on even if your application will run in an explicit `module`-only environment. ## Rule Details For files parsed as `module` by ESLint, the following are valid: ```js import 'foo' function x() { return 42 } ``` ```js export function x() { return 42 } ``` ```js (function x() { return 42 })() export {} // simple way to mark side-effects-only file as 'module' without any imports/exports ``` ...whereas the following file would be reported: ```js (function x() { return 42 })() ``` ## When Not To Use It If your application environment will always know via [some other means](https://github.com/nodejs/node-eps/issues/13) how to parse, regardless of syntax, you may not need this rule. Remember, though, that this plugin uses this strategy internally, so if you were to `import` from a module with no `import`s or `export`s, this plugin would not report it as it would not be clear whether it should be considered a `script` or a `module`. ## Further Reading - [Unambiguous JavaScript Grammar] - [`parserOptions.sourceType`] - [node-eps#13](https://github.com/nodejs/node-eps/issues/13) [`parserOptions.sourceType`]: https://eslint.org/docs/user-guide/configuring#specifying-parser-options [Unambiguous JavaScript Grammar]: https://github.com/nodejs/node-eps/blob/HEAD/002-es-modules.md#32-determining-if-source-is-an-es-module